SHOCKING AUDIO: Karoline Leavitt Blasts Jeffrey Goldberg as “Useless Scum” in Explosive Rant Over Leaked War Plans — What Are They Trying to Cover Up?

EXPLOSIVE LEAK: Karoline Leavitt Caught on Tape Calling Jeffrey Goldberg ‘Useless Scum’ Amid US War Plan Scandal—Who’s Hiding the Truth?

Karoline Leavitt Calls Jeffrey Goldberg “Useless” After Military Plan Leak

On March 26, 2025, a White House press briefing led by Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt turned into a fiery debate when she sharply criticized Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic. Her criticism came after Goldberg unintentionally leaked sensitive information about U.S. military plans related to attacks in Yemen. Leavitt did not hold back, calling Goldberg “useless” while responding to the information leak.

The Background of the Incident

It all began when a group of senior officials in the Trump administration, including National Security Advisor Michael Waltz, unintentionally exposed information about a sensitive military plan through a messaging app called Signal. These messages, containing details about the timing, targets, and methods of attack, were later discovered and published by Goldberg and other journalists.

Through these leaked documents, The Atlantic revealed details about a military strike against Houthi forces in Yemen. However, when asked about the incident, the White House asserted that no classified information was compromised and that everything had been handled appropriately. Leavitt, speaking for the White House, immediately defended the administration, while sharply criticizing Goldberg.

Leavitt’s Harsh Criticism

During the press briefing, Leavitt not only condemned the leak of information but also blamed Goldberg personally. She stated that Goldberg was “useless” for exposing military plans that could have compromised national security. “We cannot allow people like Goldberg to continue to harm our work. His actions only hurt national security and put millions in danger,” Leavitt declared forcefully.

Her comments quickly sparked controversy. Opponents of Leavitt accused her of not focusing on the real security issue but instead making personal attacks. Some suggested that Leavitt was trying to downplay the severity of the leak and deflect attention away from the security crisis it caused.

Goldberg’s Response

Jeffrey Goldberg, the prominent journalist who has led The Atlantic for years, did not directly respond to Leavitt’s criticism immediately. However, his colleagues and associates defended Goldberg, emphasizing that his actions were merely an attempt to provide necessary information about what was happening within the Trump administration and the national security threats it posed. “Press freedom is fundamental to democracy. Goldberg was simply doing the job of a journalist: bringing information to the public to ensure transparency and accountability,” a prominent journalist from The New York Times remarked.

National Security Concerns

The key question now is whether the leak of this information could seriously harm U.S. national security. National security experts argue that using an app like Signal, though encrypted, still carries risks when sensitive information is exposed beyond the control of the government. While Signal is designed to protect privacy, the fact that senior officials were discussing military plans on this platform was seen as a major security lapse.

Leavitt and her allies in the White House argue that disclosing this information was unnecessary and only weakened the country’s ability to defend itself. “We must protect our sources and maintain absolute confidentiality,” Leavitt emphasized during the briefing.

However, political opponents argue that the Trump administration cannot continue to ignore the potential dangers posed by a lack of transparency in the handling of sensitive information. They have called for a full investigation into how classified material was leaked and who should be held responsible.

Legal Repercussions

The incident goes beyond just media criticism. Democratic lawmakers have called for an investigation into whether any national security laws were violated. They argue that exposing sensitive information like this could lead to serious diplomatic and military consequences.

Some legal experts have pointed out that leaking such information could lead to lawsuits and demands for compensation if organizations are harmed by these actions. Despite these potential legal challenges, Leavitt and White House officials remain steadfast in their defense, arguing that every decision made was in the interest of protecting national security.

Leavitt and the White House’s Future

This controversy further highlights the growing tensions between the Trump administration and the media. Leavitt, who has become the face of the White House in dealing with the press, continues to face criticism from journalists and press freedom organizations. Public opinion is awaiting the next moves from the White House on how they will handle the situation and whether any reforms will be made in how classified information is shared and protected in the future.

With each confrontation between Leavitt and the press, the issue of national security and press freedom continues to be a hot topic, drawing attention from both the public and lawmakers. This incident, along with future events, will continue to test the stability of the Trump administration as it navigates the challenges of maintaining power and dealing with political issues that arise.