“Original Sin, Political Spin: Jon Stewart Skewers Media, Biden Book Frenzy on The Daily Show”

Jon Stewart says voters' desire for 'vision and leadership' helped Trump win

On a recent episode of The Daily Show, Jon Stewart returned to his signature style: smart, incisive, and dripping with satire. With a blend of wit and critique, Stewart dissected the media frenzy surrounding a new book, Original Sin, co-authored by CNN’s Jake Tapper and Axios journalist Alex Thompson. The book promises bombshell revelations about President Joe Biden’s cognitive health and decision-making during his time in office—but as Stewart points out, the spectacle surrounding its release says more about the news industry than about the president himself.

“A Bespoke, Artisanal Effort”

Stewart kicks things off with his usual tongue-in-cheek fanfare, calling the show a “bespoke, artisanal effort.” He introduces guest Patrick McGee, whose new book on Apple and China is praised with a fruit pun—“for a book about Apple, it’s bananas!”—but the real focus quickly shifts to the media’s obsession with Original Sin and the way it’s been marketed.

The first few minutes skewer how news anchors breathlessly hype the release of a book they’re involved with. Stewart shows a supercut of news personalities counting down the days until the release of Original Sin, essentially teasing their own work as if it were a Marvel movie premiere. “Breaking news… in a week!” he quips. “Isn’t that the difference between news and a secret?”

Journalism or Infomercial?

The central joke—though it’s hardly a joke alone—is that journalists, especially those at CNN, are using their platforms to sell a book containing information that arguably should’ve been reported as news, when it was news. Stewart ridicules the segment’s repetitive promotion: “And yet, if you act now and use the code backslash tap that book…”

It’s a sharp jab at the increasingly blurred line between journalism and product placement. When serious allegations about Biden’s mental fitness—like possibly being considered for a wheelchair or calling National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan “Steve”—are treated not as matters of public interest but as incentives to buy a book, the public trust in journalism is at risk. Stewart mocks the absurdity of that last claim, noting that for white men in D.C., “Steve is not a bad guess.”

Jon Stewart on CNN's Biden book: 'Selling you a book about news they should have told you' | Late-night TV roundup | The Guardian

Media Hype Meets Real-Life News

What complicates the promotional circus is the timing: right as the book is set to be released, Biden is diagnosed with cancer. Suddenly, the tone of coverage shifts. Stewart hilariously juxtaposes the book’s previous hyped-up promotions with the media’s now somber delivery. “This very tough news,” one anchor says solemnly—before seamlessly segueing into another plug for Tapper’s book.

CNN, Stewart observes, is trying to thread an impossible needle: how to promote a book about the decline of a sitting president without looking exploitative in the face of real-life tragedy. And somehow, the diagnosis is spun as more reason to buy the book. “Some observers will say the reporting in the book is even more important now,” one voice intones. Stewart’s deadpan: “Yeah, nobody’s saying that.”

He sarcastically imagines CNN on commission: “Is this a Girl Scout cookie situation? Whoever sells the most Tapper books gets a Schwinn?”

Fox News, the Right-Wing Pivot, and “Let’s Go Brandon”

While CNN faces the awkward task of pushing a book while looking compassionate, Stewart notes that Fox News and other right-wing outlets have their own contortionist act. How do you shift from gleefully mocking the president with chants of “Let’s go, Brandon” to respectfully wishing him well—and then right back to “Let’s go, Brandon”?

According to Stewart, the keyword in their rhetorical pivot is “but.” Expect lines like: “We’re praying for the president’s recovery but we still have questions about his fitness.” It’s a subtle yet powerful way of keeping their original narrative alive while temporarily donning the mask of civility.

The Bigger Critique: Modern Journalism’s Business Model

Beyond the jokes and impressions, Stewart’s deeper critique is of the structure and incentives in modern journalism. News outlets, especially 24-hour cable channels, are in constant competition for attention. In this environment, everything becomes content—even health scares, even political decline, even books written by anchors about stories they should’ve reported.

The phrase “bombshell book” has become a genre unto itself, often built on access journalism where revelations are hoarded until they can be monetized. Stewart drives the point home: the public is being asked to buy information that should be freely and urgently reported.

And yet, it’s not just CNN that’s guilty. Fox News builds walls to contain “drips” of Biden decline. Stewart jokes they’ve constructed a “Biden sucks border wall” to hold back the tsunami of leaks.

Conclusion: Holding the Mirror

Stewart’s genius lies in holding up a mirror to the absurdities of media, politics, and the narratives we’re fed. The Daily Show episode is less about Biden’s health or the merits of Tapper’s book and more about the performative, commodified nature of journalism today. It’s about how news has become marketing, how punditry trumps policy, and how spectacle overtakes substance.

The satire isn’t just funny—it’s necessary. It reminds us that while the media plays both sides of a story for maximum profit, viewers are left wondering: what’s the truth? What matters? And who can we trust to tell us?

And as Stewart might say: “You won’t believe what we found out… unless you buy the book.”

Full Video: