Blake Lively Is About to Expose Hollywood’s Dirty Secrets—Multiple Celebrities Could Be Dragged Into Court as She Files Explosive Subpoenas in Retaliation!
Rumors swirl that Lively is ready to name names, unleashing a legal firestorm that could take down some of Hollywood’s most powerful stars.

In a bizarre and unfolding legal saga that could shake Hollywood to its core, media personality Perez Hilton—known as the self-proclaimed “Queen of All Media”—has been swept up in what he’s calling the Blake Lively subpoena mess. Allegedly, Perez and political commentator Candace Owens are among the figures tied to a web of subpoenas stemming from Blake Lively’s ongoing lawsuit over the film adaptation of It Ends With Us. Whether or not Hilton will actually be served remains to be seen, but his commentary on the situation has turned heads.

“I am so riveted by all of this,” Perez began, noting how deeply intertwined the situation is with some of the most powerful and famous figures in the entertainment industry. According to Hilton, the deadline for discovery in this case was imminent, with depositions expected to wrap up by the end of July or, at the latest, August. And while Perez has yet to be served, he is already preparing to take the stand in floral print—should it come to that.

What makes this story even more sensational is the array of players involved. Lively is reportedly not just going after Perez or Owens, but also social media strategist Jed Wallace. Hilton humorously referred to Wallace as a “digital samurai” and provocateur, originally hired by Justin Baldoni’s team to assist with the film’s online reception. However, Lively’s legal team alleges that Wallace’s firm, Street Relations, may have gone beyond monitoring and into smear territory—a claim Wallace and his legal team vehemently deny.

Jed Wallace’s lawyers have responded with a letter to the court requesting a protective order against Lively’s subpoena. According to the motion, Lively is demanding that Wallace disclose his entire client list from 2023 to present—a list that allegedly includes celebrities, corporations, and private individuals who have relied on Wallace’s company for confidential crisis management services. This request, the letter claims, represents a gross violation of client privacy and lacks any direct relevance to Lively’s legal claims.

In the motion, Wallace’s legal counsel stated that revealing such names could not only damage client trust but also expose them to future legal scrutiny. The firm has already agreed to discuss its services but insists that the identity of its clients should remain confidential.

This battle over the subpoena is happening alongside Wallace’s own attempt to get dismissed from Lively’s lawsuit entirely. He argues that the court has no jurisdiction over him, citing that a similar lawsuit was filed first in Texas—a state with specific laws about which court should handle a case when multiple are involved. While Perez Hilton admits he’s no lawyer, he sums up the legal move as a strategic bid to avoid duplicative litigation.

At the core of Lively’s case is the perception that she was unfairly targeted and maligned during the rollout of It Ends With Us. The backlash began in 2023, right after her casting was announced. Online outrage surged again when paparazzi photos of Lively in costume surfaced, drawing criticism from fans of the original book. The negative buzz only intensified into 2024. Wallace’s firm maintains this reaction was organic and not influenced by any campaign they ran.

Interestingly, Hilton supports that narrative. He admits he never liked Lively as an actress—even citing a critical post he made back in June 2014 that labeled her as overrated. “It was organic,” he said about the backlash. “It was with me.”

Yet Lively, dubbed by Hilton as “Subpoena Serena,” appears determined to extract whatever digital evidence she believes might prove a coordinated smear campaign. Whether or not she succeeds may depend on how Judge Lyman rules on the protective order Wallace’s legal team has requested.

And while Lively is buried in legal maneuvers, her husband Ryan Reynolds is flying high—literally and figuratively. On Canada Day, Reynolds received the Order of Canada, the country’s highest civilian honor. Meanwhile, Lively launched a new Betty Buzz commercial for her liquor brand—despite not drinking herself. Hilton quipped that even while promoting alcohol, she somehow found time to allegedly leak to TMZ that Perez was subpoenaed—something he firmly denies.

“I have not been served with anything yet,” Perez clarified. “I haven’t even spoken to my lawyer about it because, frankly, I don’t want to pay him just to confirm rumors.”

Still, Hilton seemed to relish the drama. “Nothing would make me happier than taking the witness stand and testifying,” he said with flair, even joking that the deposition should be broadcast from Madison Square Garden.

Ultimately, what started as an indie book adaptation has exploded into a full-blown media spectacle involving subpoenas, protective orders, client confidentiality battles, and claims of reputational sabotage. The case is a messy convergence of Hollywood politics, influencer culture, and legal brinkmanship.

The next pivotal moment? Judge Lyman’s ruling on whether Wallace must expose his client list. Until then, the public will continue to speculate, celebrities will continue to sweat, and Perez Hilton—true to form—will continue to spill every ounce of tea he can find.

“That’s all for now, my fam,” he signed off. “Thoughts on the Jed Wallace of it all? Let’s discuss in the comments section.”

One thing’s clear: in the court of public opinion, this trial is already a blockbuster. And we haven’t even reached opening statements yet.