LeBron James not expected to consider significant pay cut, per report, and that poses problems for the Lakers
James was reportedly open to pay cut last season to help the Lakers pursue a select group of free agents
LeBron James has earned more money playing in the NBA than anyone else in league history. According to Spotrac, his career on-court earnings top $528 million, but at select points in his career, he has been willing to leave money on the table in order to help his team compete for championships.
Most notably, James took less than the max to join the Miami Heat in 2010. That allowed them to not only sign Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh, but also retain key reserve Udonis Haslem and use the mid-level exception to bring in Mike Miller. He began taking the max again when he returned to the Cleveland Cavaliers in 2014, in part to support other players around the league. James taking less gave owners leverage to ask other stars to do the same, so for the next 10 seasons, he made max money.
Last offseason, however, he was reportedly open to taking a meaningful pay cut in the neighborhood of $15 million in order to help the Lakers sign one of a handful of free agents. Those players were, reportedly, Jonas Valančiūnas, Klay Thompson, James Harden and DeMar DeRozan. The Lakers pursued Thompson and came up short. James wound up taking a smaller pay cut, around $2.7 million, to help the Lakers stay under the second apron.
This summer, the Lakers are theoretically operating under far more favorable basketball circumstances thanks to their midseason acquisition of Luka Dončić. They just lost in the first round to the Minnesota Timberwolves due in large part to their limited depth and versatility. If they get this offseason right, they could factor seriously into the championship picture. They will not, however, expect to receive a similar offer of financial help from James this offseason. According to The Athletic’s Sam Amick and Jovan Buha, James is not expected to consider a similar pay cut to the one offered last year.
The choice is largely in his hands. He has a player option for roughly $52.6 million next season, so if he wants to pull in max money, he has the ability to do so unilaterally. In terms of pure merit, James is probably still worth a max salary as well. He’s expected to make an All-NBA team when they are announced later this postseason, and has never missed an All-Star Game as a Laker.
But keeping James at this price point severely restricts the Lakers when it comes to player acquisition. With him earning this much, they are all but assured to be operating above the first apron. That means they can’t access the full mid-level exception of around $14.1 million to use in free agency and trades this summer. Instead, they would be limited to the taxpayer mid-level exception of around $5.7 million. Teams above the first apron also cannot acquire players via sign-and-trade, nor can they absorb more money in a trade than they send out.
In other words, a number of possible moves would likely be off of the table if James does not take a pay cut.
Now, it’s only May 2. James has until June 29 to make up his mind. It is possible that some move the Lakers engineer compels him to reconsider. This offseason just isn’t full of the sort of big-name veterans James aimed for last summer. Thompson, Harden and DeRozan are former All-Stars. Those just aren’t the sort of players that the Lakers need right now. Between himself, Dončić and Austin Reaves, the Lakers have more than enough shot-creation at the moment.
What they need are players to do the dirty work. They need a starting center and probably a backup as well, and if Anthony Edwards showed them anything in the first round, it’s how badly they need a defensive-minded guard.
James might have been willing to leave money on the table for the sake of acquiring someone like Thompson because he views him as a contemporary, someone worthy of sacrificing for. The kinds of players the Lakers would target this year just don’t come with quite as lofty a reputation. Nickeil Alexander-Walker is nowhere near as accomplished as Thompson, but he makes much more sense within the context of this current Laker roster.
Without that extra spending room, Rob Pelinka will have to get creative in reshaping the Laker roster to make a run at the 2026 championship. He will either have to find the sort of role players the Lakers need with one hand tied behind his back from a team-building perspective, or he will need to somehow convince James to reconsider a pay cut before the end of June.
Either way, the Lakers have their work cut out for them this offseason. The Timberwolves showed them how far away they are from true championship contention, and they are going to need every possible tool at their disposal if they are going to bridge that gap.
News
CARRIE ON Carrie Underwood’s future on American Idol ‘up in the air’ and she may be ‘one and done’ as she looks ‘miserable’ on set
CARRIE ON Carrie Underwood’s future on American Idol ‘up in the air’ and she may be ‘one and done’ as…
‘1923’s Helen Mirren Reveals Whether She’d Ever Return to the ‘Yellowstone’ Universe
‘1923’s Helen Mirren Reveals Whether She’d Ever Return to the ‘Yellowstone’ Universe Viewers were introduced to Helen Mirren as the Dutton matriarch,…
Taylor Sheridan’s Next Yellowstone Prequel Needs To Answer 1923’s Biggest Teonna Rainwater Question
Taylor Sheridan’s Next Yellowstone Prequel Needs To Answer 1923’s Biggest Teonna Rainwater Question Taylor Sheridan’s next Yellowstone prequel needs to answer the…
Helen Mirren has revealed a shocking truth about her mindset while filming the intense finale of 1923: she “fully expected” her character would meet her end. Her candid admission adds another layer of gravity to the already emotionally charged series. “Obviously,” she says, as if the stakes of her character’s journey were always destined to lead to such a dramatic conclusion. Fans are left wondering—what would 1923 have been without her powerful presence? This revelation not only highlights Mirren’s deep connection to the story but also leaves viewers questioning how close they came to losing one of the show’s most compelling figures. It’s a stark reminder of the unpredictable nature of storytelling, where even legends like Mirren aren’t guaranteed survival.
Helen Mirren has revealed a shocking truth about her mindset while filming the intense finale of 1923: she “fully expected”…
Harrison Ford has finally broken his silence about his future in the Yellowstone universe following his gripping role in 1923. As fans eagerly hang on to every word, his response raises as many questions as it answers. Will the legendary actor return to the sprawling, dramatic landscapes that captivated millions? Or has his chapter in this epic saga come to a close? Ford’s words carry the weight of a man who chooses his roles with care, leaving us to wonder what lies ahead for both him and the beloved series. This moment is more than just an update—it’s a spark of hope for fans yearning to see him bring his unmatched depth and gravitas back to the screen.
Harrison Ford has finally broken his silence about his future in the Yellowstone universe following his gripping role in 1923….
Harrison Ford, a legend of the screen, has left fans buzzing with the possibility of his return to the Yellowstone universe following his powerful performance in 1923. The idea of seeing Ford step back into this rugged, emotionally charged world sparks excitement and curiosity. What would his return mean for the story? Could it bring new layers of depth to the beloved series, or perhaps unravel mysteries left untold? For an actor of Ford’s caliber, his presence offers more than just star power—it’s a promise of storytelling that strikes at the heart of resilience, family, and the untamed spirit of the American West. Fans are left wondering: will he saddle up once more to continue this epic journey?
Harrison Ford, a legend of the screen, has left fans buzzing with the possibility of his return to the Yellowstone…
End of content
No more pages to load