In a new video widely shared on social media, commentator *Retro* revisits a forceful intervention by Democratic Representative Jasmine Crockett during a congressional hearing. Known for her outspokenness, Crockett spoke passionately against what she calls Republican attempts to dismantle public institutions under the guise of “government efficiency.” She strongly criticizes budget cuts, job cuts in key federal agencies, and the rushed sales of public buildings, which she likens to “fire sales.”

Musk SLAPS Jasmine Crockett With LAWSUIT After Tesla Threats - YouTube

In her speech, she also denounces the devastating impact of the Trump administration’s policies, particularly tariffs, on farmers and vulnerable citizens. Crockett asserts that these actions are not just directed at Democrats, but harm all Americans, regardless of their political leaning. She doesn’t hesitate to use powerful metaphors, claiming that “Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and 401Ks are literally burning” because of the former president’s policies.

Retro, for his part, derided Crockett’s intervention, accusing her of adopting a more “educated” tone when addressing Congress, while using more “ghetto” rhetoric whenever she mentions Donald Trump. He sees this as an example of what he calls “Trump Derangement Syndrome,” suggesting that Crockett’s personal hatred of Trump clouds her political judgment. He goes further, insinuating that Crockett may be indirectly involved in the mismanagement of public funds, due to her vehement opposition to the audits launched by Elon Musk through the Department of Government Efficiency.

Democratic Rep. Jasmine Crockett tells Elon Musk to 'F--- off' | Fox News

Retro concludes by warning that Crockett’s constant criticism of Musk could cost him dearly, as he believes Elon Musk would not hesitate to take legal action if necessary. He accuses the congresswoman of spreading dangerous messages, undermining reform efforts, and endangering the institutions she claims to defend.

This video, a mix of sarcastic commentary and sharp political analysis, has sparked strong reactions, particularly around questions of style, form, and substance in contemporary American political discourse.