Jealous Angel Reese Gets SLAMMED For Calling Out Caitlin Clark | Her Mom Says It’s RACIST

In the world of women’s college basketball, few players have created the kind of excitement Caitlin Clark has in the last few years. The University of Iowa star has made waves with her incredible skills, dynamic playstyle, and undeniable charisma, driving record-breaking viewership for women’s sports. But with increased attention often comes intense rivalry—and, for some, outright resentment.

Enter Angel Reese, a rising star for LSU, who has recently come under fire for what many perceive as a social media dig at Caitlin Clark. Reese, a talented forward, was caught in a heated exchange that quickly spiraled into an online controversy after she posted a tweet many thought was directed at Clark. The tweet, which has since been deleted, read, “That’s on getting a win in a packed arena. This dumb [expletive] can’t even [expletive] spell, not just because of one player on our Charter flight with a little kiss face #SkyToown.”

Reese’s social media post, though vague, seemed to take aim at Clark’s visibility and the way she has dominated headlines in recent years, even suggesting that the attention on Clark was overblown. The tweet quickly gained traction on social media, igniting a firestorm of reactions, with many pointing out the clear target of Reese’s frustration.

However, it didn’t take long for Reese to backtrack and delete the tweet amid mounting backlash. The online criticism only intensified, with many accusing Reese of harboring jealousy and trying to tear down Clark’s success. What followed was an even more charged response—this time from Reese’s mother.

Reese’s mom took to social media, claiming her daughter’s tweet was misinterpreted and that it wasn’t aimed at Clark at all. According to her, the post was intended to call out the media, not the Iowa star. In an attempt to clarify her daughter’s position, Reese’s mom added that the criticism Angel had received was racially charged, calling the online abuse “violent” and “racist.”

She wrote, “She was not attacking Caitlin Clark, but because you and the rest of those ‘Children of the Corn’ folks thought she was, once again sending her racist and vile comments.”

The reference to “Children of the Corn” did little to alleviate the situation, as many pointed out that this comment was itself racially insensitive, turning the conversation into an even more toxic mess.

The debate that has since unfolded isn’t just about the tweet and who it was directed at—it’s also about the broader tensions in women’s professional sports, particularly within the WNBA. As Clark has brought unprecedented attention to the women’s game, she has become a lightning rod for both admiration and criticism, with some believing her success is shining a light on deeper issues within the WNBA itself.

For years, the WNBA has struggled with financial instability and low viewership, but Caitlin Clark’s rise has sparked hope for the future of the league. As more fans tune in to watch college basketball, especially the women’s tournament, they’re also becoming more aware of the WNBA. This has brought unprecedented attention to the women’s game—something that has left some players and pundits questioning the dynamics within women’s sports.

At the heart of the issue is the reality that Caitlin Clark has become the face of women’s basketball, largely due to her remarkable skills and ability to capture the public’s imagination. Her performances have brought record-breaking viewership to women’s college basketball, drawing in fans who were previously uninterested in the sport. Yet, for some, particularly those within the WNBA, there seems to be an undercurrent of resentment about the dominance Clark has achieved.

Despite her success, Clark’s presence has also amplified some of the league’s underlying problems. The WNBA remains financially troubled, with players often traveling on commercial flights due to the league’s inability to secure private chartered flights for its teams. There are also still complaints about the lack of pay and recognition for women athletes compared to their male counterparts.

Many point to Clark as the athlete who could be the game-changer for the sport’s future, yet some within the WNBA feel threatened by her stardom, particularly when it shines a light on the league’s challenges. It’s a complicated dynamic where admiration for Clark is met with frustration from others in women’s sports who feel overshadowed by her success.

Reese’s tweet, and the fallout that followed, has only highlighted the jealousy and division that can emerge when one player’s rise overshadows the collective struggles of others. It’s clear that Reese, whether intentional or not, tapped into a broader frustration that has simmered under the surface for years.

But where does the line between competition and petty rivalry get drawn? Some argue that the venom in the comments directed at Clark stems from a deeper, unspoken animosity—a resentment toward a player whose talent and personality have allowed her to transcend the usual barriers in women’s sports. Others, however, see the backlash as a toxic response to the reality that women’s sports are often seen through a narrow lens—one that too frequently centers race and gender, overshadowing the pure talent that players like Caitlin Clark bring to the table.

Reese’s mother’s claim of racism, however, has added an even more volatile element to the discourse. For some, it has only compounded the divisiveness between athletes, media, and fans. Is it really about race? Or is it simply about who gets the spotlight?

As the dust settles, one thing is certain: Angel Reese and Caitlin Clark’s rivalry is far from over. Whether the attention continues to grow or whether the media eventually moves on to the next hot story, it’s clear that the stakes have never been higher for women’s basketball—and for the players at its center.

In the end, only time will tell how this drama unfolds and whether the competitive spirit between Reese and Clark can coexist in a way that propels the sport forward.